Unravelling the Gender Dynamics in Sports Coaching

Introduction

Coaching in sports is a multifaceted endeavour that extends far beyond the field or court. It involves intricate relationships, underlying assumptions, and the acknowledgment of individual differences. One crucial factor that significantly shapes the coaching landscape is gender (1,2). In this article, we'll delve deeper into the role gender plays in sports coaching and why it's imperative to reconsider coaching practices with a gender-neutral perspective.

The Complex World of Coach-Athlete Interactions

The world of sports coaching is dynamic, with countless variables affecting each unique coaching relationship. However, amid this complexity, gender relations persist as a constant and often problematic issue (2). To understand this issue better, we must examine the foundations of coaching, the biases that affect it, and their consequences.

Gender Bias: A Persistent Problem

Gender bias within sports coaching is a deeply rooted concern that has garnered considerable attention in recent years (2). Despite the strides made in gender equality in sports, this bias still infiltrates coaching practices, particularly in the realm of motivational orientations (2,3).

Research demonstrates that male coaches often adapt their coaching styles depending on the gender of their athletes. When working with male athletes, they tend to adopt a goal-oriented approach, emphasizing competition, performance, and rigorous training (3). Conversely, when coaching female athletes, a task-oriented approach prevails, emphasizing teamwork, enjoyment, and a more laid-back atmosphere (3).

The Root of Bias

This gender-based disparity in coaching practices is deeply rooted in societal perceptions. Historically, female athletes were relegated to sports perceived as more "inclusive and sociable" rather than the "physical and competitive" sports dominated by male athletes due to stereotypes about their perceived physical inferiority (2,4). These biases continue to influence how male coaches perceive and interact with female athletes.

Recent research, however, suggests a shift in this traditional pattern. Coaches are increasingly investing more effort in coaching female athletes, signalling a potential move in the right direction. Nonetheless, this change doesn't necessarily indicate progress. It can be attributed to a different form of gender bias that assumes female athletes lack specific knowledge and skills, inadvertently highlighting their perceived inferiority (5).

Training Disparities

Male coaches often schedule longer training sessions for female athletes, allocate more time for off-task activities, and provide less time for skill practice compared to their male counterparts (5). This divide in coaching practices could potentially hinder female athletes from reaching their full potential, perpetuating gender disparities in sports performance.

Contrary to the stereotypes and biases, female athletes often seek a democratic coach-athlete relationship. They value enjoyment, personal involvement in decision-making, and the opportunity to explore the rationale behind coaching decisions (2,6).

It's also essential to recognize that male and female athletes respond differently to coaching methods, particularly punishment. Research indicates that the use of punishment by male coaches can have a more detrimental effect on the motivation of female athletes compared to their male counterparts (7).

The Way Forward: A Gender-Neutral Approach

In conclusion, it's evident that male and female athletes have different preferences and needs from their coaches (8). This highlights the necessity for personalized coaching approaches that consider gender differences.

However, to bridge the gender gap in sports coaching, coaches should apply a critical "gender lens" to identify and rectify their own biases (5). Moving towards a gender-neutral approach, where the importance of each athlete as an individual takes precedence over gender, is crucial (9,10). Gender should be just one of many considerations and should not dictate coaching methods. Striving for equality and inclusivity in sports coaching will ensure that every athlete, regardless of gender, has an equal opportunity to thrive.

References

1. Jowett S, Poczwardowski A. Understanding the Coach-Athlete Relationship. In: Jowett S, Lavellee D, editors. Social Psychology in Sport. Human Kinetics; 2007.

2. Norman L. Is There a Need for Coaches to Be More Gender Responsive? A Review of the Evidence. Int Sport Coach J. 2016 May;3(2):192–6.

3. Felton L, Jowett S. “What do coaches do” and “How do they relate”: Their Effects on Athletes’ Psychological Needs and Functioning. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Mar;23(2):e130–9.

4. Weiss M, Stevens C. Motivation and Attrition of Female Coaches: An Application of Social Exchange Theory. Sport Psychol. 1993 Sep;7(3):244–61.

5. Gosai J, Jowett S, Rhind D. Coaching through a “Gender Lens” May Reveal Myths that Hinder Female Athletes: A Multistudy Investigation. Int Sport Coach J. 2022 May 1;9(2):222–33.

6. MacKinnon V. Techniques for Instructing Female Athletes in Traditionally Male Sports: A Case Study of LPGA Teaching Professionals. The International Journal of Sport and Society. 2011;2(1):75–88.

7. Felton L, Jowett S. On Understanding the Role of Need Thwarting in the Association Between Athlete Attachment and Well/Ill-being. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Apr;25(2):289–98.

8. Chelladurai P, Saleh S. Dimensions of Leader Behavior in Sports: Development of a Leadership Scale. Journal of Sport Psychology. 1980 Apr;2(1):34–45.

9. Norman L, French J. Understanding How High Performance Women Athletes Experience the Coach-Athlete Relationship. International Journal of Coaching Science. 2013;7(1):3–24.

10. LaVoi N, Boucher C. Gender Perspectives. In: Davis L, Keegan R, Jowett S, editors. Social Psychology in Sport. Human Kinetics; 2007.